Category Archives: Continental shelf

Opposite or adjacent – does it make a difference? Delimiting the continental shelf beyond 200 nm

By: Signe Veierud Busch http://site.uit.no/jclos/files/2017/12/JCLOS-Blog-011217_Blogpost-ghana-cote-divoire.pdf Case commented on: ITLOS Special Chamber, Judgment in Dispute Concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire in the Atlantic Ocean, 23 September 2017. In Dispute Concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary … Continue reading

Posted in Adjacent coast, Continental shelf, Entitlement, Jurisdiction, Maritime delimitation, Opposite coast | Leave a comment

State responsibility for unilateral hydrocarbon activities in disputed maritime areas: The case of Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire and its implications

By: Natalia Ermolina and Constantinos Yiallourides PDF version: http://site.uit.no/jclos/files/2017/11/JCLOS-Blog-231117_Ghana-blog_final.pdf Case commented on: ITLOS Special Chamber, Judgment in Dispute Concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary Between Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire in the Atlantic Ocean, 23 September 2017. Background to the dispute … Continue reading

Posted in Continental shelf, Delimitation, Disputed areas, Hydrocarbons, Oil and gas, State responsibility, unilateralism | Leave a comment

ITLOS Judgment in the Maritime Boundary Dispute between Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire

By: Nigel Bankes PDF version: ITLOS Judgment in the Maritime Boundary Dispute between Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire Case commented on: ITLOS Special Chamber, Judgment in Dispute Concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary Between Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire in the Atlantic … Continue reading

Posted in Continental shelf, Delimitation, Exclusive ecnomic zone, Good faith, Law of the Sea Convention, Oil and gas, Special circumstances, State responsibility, Territorial Sea Delimitation, Three-stage process | Leave a comment

EFTA Surveillance Authority Rejects Complaint Against Norway Related to Snow Crab Fisheries

By: Maria Madalena das Neves PDF version: EFTA Surveillance Authority Rejects Complaint Against Norway Related to Snow Crab Fisheries Decision commented on: EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision of 4 October 2017 closing a complaint case against the Norwegian Government concerning restrictions … Continue reading

Posted in Continental shelf, EEA Law, European Union, Fisheries, Law of the Sea Convention, Norwegian Fisheries Law, Svalbard Treaty | Leave a comment

Compulsory Conciliation under the Law of the Sea Convention: rich pickings in the Decision on Objections to Competence of the Timor-Leste\Australia Conciliation Commission

By: Nigel Bankes PDF Version: Compulsory Conciliation under the Law of the Sea Convention: rich pickings in the Decision on Objections to Competence of the Timor-Leste\Australia Conciliation Commission Decision commented on: Conciliation Commission, Between the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste and … Continue reading

Posted in Conciliation, Continental shelf, Exclusive ecnomic zone | 3 Comments

The South China Sea Arbitration’s Interpretation of Article 121(3) of the LOSC: A Disquieting First

By: Alex G. Oude Elferink PDF Version: The South China Sea Arbitration’s Interpretation of Article 121(3) of the LOSC: a Disquieting First Decision commented on: The Matter of the South China Sea Arbitration, Between the Republic of Philippines and The … Continue reading

Posted in Arbitration, China, Continental shelf, Exclusive ecnomic zone, Islands, Philippines, Rocks, South China Sea, Spratly Islands | 2 Comments

ITLOS Special Chamber Prescribes Provisional Measures with Respect to Oil and Gas Activities in Disputed Area in Case Involving Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire

By: Nigel Bankes PDF Version: ITLOS Special Chamber Prescribes Provisional Measures with Respect to Oil and Gas Activities in Disputed Area in Case Involving Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire Decision commented on: International Tribunal on the Law of the Sea (ITLOS), … Continue reading

Posted in Continental shelf, Oil and gas, Provisional measures | Leave a comment

Norwegian by-catch regulations are not discriminatory

By: Irene Dahl PDF Version: Norwegian by-catch regulations are not discriminatory Case commented on: The Kiel case http://lovdata.no/dokument/HRSTR/avgjorelse/hr-2014-577-a On March 21, 2014 the Supreme Court of Norway gave judgement in the Kiel case. The background to the case is discussed … Continue reading

Posted in Arctic, Continental shelf, Fisheries, Litigation, Norwegian Fisheries Law, Svalbard Fisheries Protection Zone, Svalbard Treaty | Leave a comment

Norwegian by-catch regulations alleged to violate the Svalbard Treaty

By: Tore Henriksen PDF Version: Norwegian by-catch regulations alleged to violate the Svalbard Treaty Matter commented on: The Kiel case On March 11 and 12, 2014 the Supreme Court of Norway heard a case that may have consequences for the … Continue reading

Posted in Arctic, Continental shelf, Fisheries, Litigation, Norwegian Fisheries Law, Svalbard Fisheries Protection Zone, Svalbard Treaty | Leave a comment

The Arctic Sunrise Incident and the International Law of the Sea

By: Alex Oude Elferink PDF Version: The Arctic Sunrise Incident and the International Law of the Sea Decision commented on: The “Arctic Sunrise” Case (Kingdom of the Netherlands v Russian Federation, Request for the prescription of provisional measures, Order of 22 … Continue reading

Posted in Arbitration, Arctic, Continental shelf, Hot pursuit, Installations, Law enforcement, Provisional measures, Safety Zones | Leave a comment