Sierge Rasmus (S\u00e1mi allaskuvla ja Giellagas-instituhtta, Oulu universitehta)<\/p>\n
Vie\u010d\u010da artihkkala: Ohcejoga nuoraid du\u00e1la geavaheapmi<\/a> (pdf).<\/p>\n D\u00e1n artihkkalis guorahalan man st\u00e1\u0111is davvis\u00e1megiela du\u00e1la geavaheapmi lea ohcejohkala\u0161 nuoraid h\u00e1llangielas. Dutkama v\u00e1r\u00e1s lean jearahallan guhtta 15\u201325-jahk\u00e1sa\u0161 nuora. Veardidanmateri\u00e1lan jearahallen guokte 1960-logus rieg\u00e1dan ohcejohkala\u010d\u010da ja ear\u00e1 veardidanmateri\u00e1la lean \u010dohkken arkiivag\u00e1lduin. Materi\u00e1la analysas lean guorahallan du\u00e1la subjeaktapronomeniid ja vearba- ja oamastansojaheami. Kejonen (2017) lea evttohan ahte s\u00e1megielaid du\u00e1las lea hierarkiija, man vuo\u0111ul subjeaktapronomeniin lea nannosamos saj\u00e1dat. Du\u00e1la s\u00e1htt\u00e1 leat vearbamorfologiijas, jus dat lea subjeaktapronomeniin ja vai du\u00e1la s\u00e1htt\u00e1 leat oamastansojahus, de dat ferte leat maidd\u00e1i ovddibuin.<\/p>\n D\u00e1n dutkamu\u0161a analysa \u010d\u00e1jeha, ahte nuoraid gielas du\u00e1la subjeaktapronomenat leat badjel 94 % giellaoahpala\u010d\u010dat vuorddehahtti logus. Vearbbaid du\u00e1lasojahusas badjel 71 % d\u00e1hp\u00e1husain leat vuorddehahtti logus, muhto inform\u00e1nttat leat d\u00e1n ektui hui heterogena joavku. Du\u00e1la oamastansojahusas fas badjela\u0161 31 % leat vuorddehahtti logus. D\u00e1t bohtosat orrot nannemin evttohuvvon du\u00e1lahierarkiija. Vaikke du\u00e1la lohkokategoriija ii leatge j\u00e1vkan inform\u00e1nttaid idioleavttain, de eanemusat giellaoahpala\u0161 h\u00e1mit leat subjeaktapronomeniin, unnimusat oamastansojahusas.<\/p>\n F\u00e1dd\u00e1s\u00e1nit<\/strong>: du\u00e1la, re\u00e1la\u00e1igemetoda, olgguldas\u00e1igemetoda, sosiolingvistihkka, giela varia\u0161uvdna rievdan<\/p>\n In this article, I examine how much the use of dual number varies in the colloquial language of young people from Ohcejohka. For the study, I interviewed six young people aged 15\u201325. As a reference material, I interviewed two people from Ohcejohka who were born in the 1960s, and I collected other reference material from archival sources. I analyzed the use of dual number in subject pronouns, verb inflection, and possessive suffixes. Kejonen (2017) has proposed that the Saami languages have a hierarchy for the dual number similar to the Animacy hierarchy (Corbett 2000). According to Kejonen, in the Saami languages the presence of dual number in personal pronouns is a prerequisite for dual number in finite verb forms, and the dual number must be present in both preceding positions for it to appear in possessive suffixes.<\/p>\n In this study, I found that in the adolescent material more than 94 % of the dual subject pronouns were grammatically correct. The same number for the finite verb forms was over 71 % and for the possessive suffixes just over 31 %. There is variation among the informants, but these findings support Kejonen\u2019s proposed dual hierarchy. Even though the dual number has not vanished from any of these idiolects, the numbers show progressively increasing variation when we compare personal pronouns to finite verb forms and then to possessive suffixes.<\/p>\n Keywords<\/strong>: dual number, real time method, apparent time method, sociolinguistics, language variation and change<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Ohcejoga nuoraid du\u00e1la geavaheapmi Sierge Rasmus (S\u00e1mi allaskuvla ja Giellagas-instituhtta, Oulu universitehta) Vie\u010d\u010da artihkkala: Ohcejoga nuoraid du\u00e1la geavaheapmi (pdf). D\u00e1n artihkkalis guorahalan man st\u00e1\u0111is davvis\u00e1megiela du\u00e1la geavaheapmi lea ohcejohkala\u0161 nuoraid h\u00e1llangielas. Dutkama v\u00e1r\u00e1s lean jearahallan guhtta 15\u201325-jahk\u00e1sa\u0161 nuora. Veardidanmateri\u00e1lan jearahallen … Les videre The use of dual number among the youth in Ohcejohka municipality<\/strong><\/h3>\n