Sexy slides and appealing avalanches the case of Skredkallen, Vannøya

-by Louise Vick

The rockslide and rock avalanche desposit Skredkallen is located on the island Vannøya, a large mountainous island on the outer coast of Troms. It contains spectacular large craggy mountains (up to 1000 m directly from sea level), white sandy beaches, exposed tundra, reindeer and even it’s own fjord! The island is accessed by ferry only, but is well worth a day or weekend visit from Tromsø. In my humble opinion, this is one good looking rockslide. The work presented here involved some Sherlock-style detective skills from UiT’s finest geomorphologists, geochronologists, Quaternary geologists and engineering geologists.

Skredkallen rockslide from UAV, looking east down over the rock avalanche deposit

Background

We discovered the Skredkallen rockslide by accident. Hanne-Kristin Paulsen, a PhD student in bedrock geology at the time, was researching faults and mineralisations of the West Troms Basement Complex on the island. She showed me some images of a rock avalanche deposit, asking how it should be mapped, and a new project was born!

 

We traveled to Vannøya to check it out, which involves several hours of driving and around 2 hours hiking to reach the rockslide site. On the first visit i was joined by Steffen Bergh, structural geology extraordinaire from my department, but impossible to keep on task when he is in the field (being the West Troms Basement Complex is a bit like being a kid in a candy shop for him). After hours of stopping at outcropping shear zones and folds etc along the hiking path, I got a glimpse of the site before we needed to turn back to beat nightfall. It wasn’t just a large rock avalanche deposit but also an active rockslide above!

The following season masters students Leif Trønnes and Martin Mikkelsen began their masters theses on the topic- the former on the unstable rock slope, the latter on the deposit and timing relationships of the rock avalanche.

Martin and Leif had their work cut out for them. Vanna is a very exposed mountain, prone to every season in one day. They fought gales, storms, scrambles up steep slopes in the rain. They transported heavy coring equipment on sleds behind cross country skis. Leif lost a phone to a rock fracture. Perhaps the most challenging was transporting beer and other necessities from the car park along the trail to the cabin near the rock avalanche site. I contributed to the fracas somewhat by catching the wrong ferry on one field trip- we ended up spending quite a few hours on Reinøya, very much a different island.

Leif and Martin hauling gear in on bikes and skis

It payed off however. We had some really interesting findings which are now published open access in the journal Geomorphology: Evolution and temporal constraints of a multiphase postglacial rock slope failure. AND some great days out on the island!

Leif and Martin on the Skredkallen ridgeline, strapping on the drone for a long hike down precarious slope faces
Nice weather days do happen on Vannøya! Picture includes Sofia Kjellman and Lis Allart (Quaternary geologists and contributors to this work), as well as Martin Mikkelsen

Description of the site

The rockslide sits inside a ‘bite’ in the Laukvikfjellet ridegline, lying between 470 and 270 m asl on the east-facing slope. The sliding mass is offset across major backscarps and contains blocks and columns with flat terraces draped by a thin grassy veneer and delimited at the front by steep cliff faces. The volume of the rockslide was calculated to be 3 Mm3. It is moving downwards to the ENE at a rate of 5-10 mm/yr (measured on InSAR Norway). The sliding movement at Skredkallen is likely controlled by Foliation, joints, and aided by the deteriorated mylonite shear zones.

The Skredkallen rockslide, looking south (note tiny people for scale)

At the foot of the unstable slope, a large lobe of rubbly rock avalanche material stretches out to the NE for 1400 m from the foot of the Laukvikfjellet slope across the strandflat. Blocky rock avalanche deposits are found in the inner portion of the lobe, up to 20 m in diameter. Smoother and less vegetated surface material occurs in a concentric pattern around the outer lobe. The rock avalanche deposits are also eroded in windows within the lobe, and in front of the deposit body. In these eroded areas only large blocks (>2 m diameter) remain, implying finer material has been washed out. The source area for the rock avalanche, above, where the rockslide is located today, is missing 34 Mm3 of rock. This is likely the initial volume of the rockslide which lead to the rock avalanche deposit.

Rock avalanche debris, with Leif for scale
Multiaspect hillshade of Skredkallen showing the rockslide and the blocky avalanche deposits below
Geomorphological map of Skredkallen

Age dating and site evolution

A key piece of evidence for this work was the raised shorelines: the Marine Limit is buried by the rock avalanche, while the Main Shoreline (Younger Dryas, 12.2 cal. ka BP) and Tapes shoreline (7.6-7.2 cal. ka BP) is mapped across the deposit lobe (see Geomorphological map above). The Main shoreline clearly separates smooth from blocky rock avalanche deposits at the outer lobe, and the Tapes shoreline is a sharp notch separating smooth from eroded rock avalanche deposits at the front of the lobe. In addition, organic matter sampled and carbon dated from from Pond 1 on top of the avalanche deposits had a maximum age of 1.7 cal. ka BP.

Lis and Sofia inspect the sediment core

Above left: Leif and Martin victorious after an arduous sediment core extraction. Above right: Delicious seeds extracted for carbon dating analysis. Below: Martin and Sofia selecting seeds in the UiT lab.

This line of evidence suggests this large rock avalanche event occurred after 15–14 cal. ka BP and prior to 12.2 cal. ka BP. This is in agreement with other Norwegian case studies suggesting that the peak of rock slope failure activity occurred soon after deglaciation, due to stress release by ice unloading and isostatic rebound.

As we have established the timing of the avalanche prior to 12.2 cal. ka BP, we know the avalanche must have fallen into the sea (as it was relatively much higher at that time). What is now the exposed strandflat contained soft, wet marine sediments. As the large deposit moved downwards and into the sea, it would have picked up these soft sediments, ploughing them and mixing them with the deposit clasts to form the compact ridges of smooth rock avalanche material at the eastern and southern flanks of the lobe. Encountering ‘deformable substrates’ can increase mobility in some circumstances. This probably explains the long runout of the avalanche from the source near the rockslide.

The large time gap between the shorelines’ formation and age from the pond sediment dating may be because the pond formed later, or explained by the low sediment production on the somewhat barren island. Alternatively, avalanche activity may have been episodic,with a rock avalanche occurring after the first main event and providing the topography for the lake to form.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.