{"id":13,"date":"2018-05-04T10:33:49","date_gmt":"2018-05-04T08:33:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/site.uit.no\/hybrid\/?page_id=13"},"modified":"2019-06-19T23:04:37","modified_gmt":"2019-06-19T21:04:37","slug":"media","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/site.uit.no\/hybrid\/media\/","title":{"rendered":"Media"},"content":{"rendered":"

In the media:<\/h1>\n

\"Related<\/p>\n

Totalforsvarskonseptet<\/h1>\n

Skrevet av\u00a0Gunhild Hoogensen Gj\u00f8rv<\/em><\/p>\n

I en krise er v\u00e5re kapasiteter som sivile like viktige som myndigheter og Forsvaret. Tillit er n\u00f8kkelordet.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

I fjor h\u00f8st fikk\u00a0<\/b>alle husholdninger tilsendt brosjyren \u00abDu er en del av Norges beredskap\u00bb fra Direktoratet for samfunnssikkerhet og beredskap (DSB) med r\u00e5d om forberedelser og h\u00e5ndtering av mulige kriser.
\nLenke til artikkelen<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

\"Image<\/a><\/p>\n

Learning Painful Lessons from Afghanistan<\/h1>\n

By Gunhild Hoogensen Gj\u00f8rv<\/em><\/p>\n

Conflicts, both in Afghanistan as well as at home, will continue to have both a complex civilian and military character<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

When the\u00a0International Security Assistance Force (ISAF)<\/a>\u00a0finally closed shop in Afghanistan in 2014, many participating nations professed a weariness with complex, civil-military, out-of-area operations. These operations demanded close, often awkward, relationships of cooperation, co-existence, and confrontation between different civil and military actors, including local civilians. Amid the withdrawal, many militaries and their defense departments seemed to express a collective sigh of relief, talking about a \u2018return\u2019 to strictly military priorities and operations. The focus shifted to \u2018near area\u2019 operations and security concerns at home.<\/p>\n

Link to article<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

Hybrid Warfare and the Role Civilians Play<\/strong><\/h1>\n

On 16 July 2018 the press conference following the long anticipated Putin\u2013Trump Summit meeting in Helsinki, Finland was met with astonishment and anger from both American media and politicians and allies. American president Donald Trump sided with Russian president Vladimir Putin regarding accusations of Russian meddling in the US 2016 presidential election. The evidence procured by American intelligence agencies against Russian agents and those cooperating with Russia to manipulate public opinion and the American elections has thus far resulted in the indictment of at least 31 people, including some of Trump\u2019s own political staff.
\nLink to article<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

I seng med fienden?<\/h2>\n

Etter NATOs tilbaketrekning fra Afghanistan har de europeiske statene fokusert langt mer p\u00e5 sikkerhetsutfordringer i egne n\u00e6romr\u00e5der. I Norge kan man for eksempel se denne sikkerhetspolitiske reorienteringen ved en ny aktualisering av totalforsvarskonseptet. Dette konseptet har sin historie fra den kalde krigen, og tilstreber et tett samarbeid mellom Forsvaret og det sivile samfunn for \u00e5 sikre b\u00e5de menneskelig og statlig sikkerhet.
\nLink til artikkelen<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\n

\"Image<\/p>\n

UiT skal forske p\u00e5 sivile i hybridkrig<\/h1>\n

Sivil-milit\u00e6r samhandling er sentralt i et nytt forskningsprosjekt kalt ResilientCivilians ved UiT. Hva skjer med sivile i en hybridkrig?
\nDet hersker en form for enighet om at fremtidige internasjonale konflikter i Europa kommer til \u00e5 bli dominert av, eller i alle fall omfatte, hybrid krigf\u00f8ring. En form for slik hybrid krigf\u00f8ring kan f.eks. den p\u00e5st\u00e5tte russiske innblandingen i valgkampen i USA.
\nLink to article<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\n

\"Image<\/p>\n

The Primakov (Not Gerasimov) Doctrine in Action<\/h1>\n

The Primakov doctrine has set Russia\u2019s recent course. The Kremlin must decide if it should continue to follow the doctrine, or if it should pursue a more robust set of global ambitions.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Since 2014, Russian \u201chybrid warfare\u201d has been at the center of attention of Western security analysts. The Kremlin\u2019s reliance on proxies, disinformation, and measures short of war has created the impression that its hybrid capabilities are distinct and separate from its military and can serve as a substitute for hard power. That impression is incorrect. Russian military and hybrid activities and tools are inextricably linked.<\/p>\n

Link to article<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

\"Image<\/p>\n

Populism\u2019s Call to Citizenship<\/h1>\n

By\u00a0Christopher Holshek<\/em><\/p>\n

Current threats to democracy and the liberal world order from authoritarian populism are due to the failures in governance and civics that have given it fertile ground. Like terrorism, hybrid warfare, and other distributed people-centric challenges in peace and security within and beyond borders, authoritarian populism is an international strategic challenge in human security and peacebuilding. Strategies to combat authoritarian populism must: first, distinguish it as an international security challenge, including its use of strategic narratives to sway populaces; second, see it as a result of failed citizenship as much as failed government; and third, employ a strategic peacebuilding approach to governance and citizenship that is as bottom-up as top-down.<\/p>\n

Link to article<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n